Results with the E-One

E>One

Clinical Tests

  • Methodology of the clinical study
  • Tolerance
  • Results : efficiency

methodology of the clinical Study

E-Swin, the manufacturer of the E-One in France, founded a scientific committee in order to effectively evaluate the E-One’s performance against the other professional IPL devices. The committee consisted of dermatologists, doctors, lecturers, and hair specialists to ensure that their findings were comprehensive. The aim was to conduct a broad spectrum of tests in many different scenarios to establish how the E-One performs, and to also evaluate its performance against leading IPL devices on the market.

In 2008, the committee commenced a clinical study under medical care. The survey were involving both 63 male and female volunteers, ages ranging from 18 to 55 years old, with a diverse range of skin types from phototypes II, III and IV.

The initial phase of the study was carried out in a famous hospital in Paris and also in a clinic located in Aix en Provence. The goal was to confirm the absolute tolerance levels of the treatment and to rate the superiority of IPL technology versus wax hair removal. Waxing was used for comparison as it is the most widely used form of hair removal methods. The trial focused on hair removal from the underarm area. Randomly selected individuals were chosen to undergo a hair removal session, with a balance of E-One treatment and wax depilation.

Examinations were then performed by dermatologist 15 minutes and 24 hours post treatment. 2 external expert in dermatology, external from the main committee, examined and provided an evaluation on the pictures of each subjects’ underarm area. They were not informed of the methods utilised.

Photographic images were taken in order to monitor progress every 7 weeks by the laboratory technicians. Subsequent hair removal sessions and dermatological examinations were conducted post treatment.

Tolerance

The results show that there are no long-lasting irritating effects when using the 2 techniques.

  • 15 mn after hair removal, we notice very light redness amongst only 21% of the participants using  the E-One (versus 46% with waxing) and in any case, no important redness (versus 11% with waxing).
  • After 24h, with the E-One, only 3% still have light redness (7% for waxing).
  • 15 mn after hair removal, we notice a very light inflammation for only 7% (14% for waxing) and after 24h, there is no inflammation with both techniques.

The Results

Average of the results according to the two investigators.

This chart shows the result of a clinical study regarding the user after removing hair with the E-One and with a traditional waxing treatment over 343 days.

After only 2 treatments, the results are very positive since 85% of users prefer using the E-One than doing waxing.

buynow-green

e-one

Results with the E-One

newsletter2

News & Press

Publications

E-One Videos

Facebook

FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInPinterestEmailShare/this
Designed and Hosted by artware™